Notices tagged with wikipedia

Notices

  1. strypey strypey

    @clacke I can continue to develop my text and references and argue for their inclusion in #, and/ or I can use them elsewhere.

    about 5 days ago from quitter.se in context
  2. strypey strypey

    @clacke so if I spend time on edits and especially on new pages, even if they don't end up part of canonical #, they're never lost

    about 5 days ago from quitter.se in context
  3. strypey strypey

    @clacke my main focus here is not on pronouncements for consumption by passive readers. # is an adequate tool for that purpose.

    about 11 days ago from quitter.se in context
  4. strypey strypey

    @natecull @woozle @dredmorbius I started # to host the primary research that # can't, simply because its an encylopedia

    about 11 days ago from quitter.se
  5. strypey strypey

    I started a # page for the # Any links for good refs welcome, especially on the origin of the name
    http://qttr.at/1uv3

    about 20 days ago from quitter.se
  6. strypey strypey

    Just had updated the # page on # Please correct obvious mistakes and add reliable, secondary sources
    http://qttr.at/37

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se
  7. strypey strypey

    @deadsuperhero @maiyannah I was looking at how few of the projects on the # page on # are still being maintained. Very few

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se in context
  8. strypey strypey

    I've done some research on support for #, results here, corrections welcome before I update the # page
    http://qttr.at/1scy

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se
  9. Matthew Davidson mjd

    @tregeagle Tim Harford! Yes, that was the fellow I was thinking of. I need to plug an external hard drive into the bit of my brain that remembers names. Oh wait; that's #

    about 2 months ago from web in context
  10. strypey strypey

    An update for those following the edit war... um... debate over the contents of the # (software) page on # ... 

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se in context
  11. strypey strypey

    @lyskar # editors are not the # I edit # Most of us are familiar with the concept of testing against reality

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se
  12. strypey strypey

    @beadsland it's obvious that the sun is in the sky during the day. If I said that in a # article, would you ask for a source?

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se in context
  13. strypey strypey

    @beadsland oh no. You're not editor Czar on # by any chance?

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se in context
  14. strypey strypey

    @beadsland which is stated on the project page that has been a ref on the # page since it was created
    http://qttr.at/1ro5

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se in context
  15. strypey strypey

    @rw your one on # and Mastodon (software) on # Reference may have been put back in. I may have started an edit war :0

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se
  16. strypey strypey

    It's really weird trying to convince the # # that # users can follow # users and vice-versa.

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se in context
  17. strypey strypey

    @maiyannah can you think of a "secondary source" for that information? Still duking it out with that # on # ;)

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se
  18. strypey strypey

    While we're at it, the # page on # could do with some serious updating too
    http://qttr.at/37

    about 2 months ago from quitter.se
  19. strypey strypey

    Today, for the first time, I found myself in an edit war on #! It's like a weird online role-playing game ;P I'm restraining myself

    about 3 months ago from quitter.se
  20. strypey strypey

    Writing for the # article on # today I realise I've become a dense-jargon-spouting ur-geek. I need a tech illiterate editor

    about 3 months ago from quitter.se in context
Pagination